tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33546923.post4503090568753331291..comments2023-10-29T17:30:17.075+08:00Comments on 騏: before & after黑人http://www.blogger.com/profile/11183654603140382242noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33546923.post-15305801071142897222009-05-25T08:50:54.108+08:002009-05-25T08:50:54.108+08:00黑人你呢個解釋好屈機XD黑人你呢個解釋好屈機XD塞米一條揚陸轟炸機https://www.blogger.com/profile/10159088202982169884noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33546923.post-12800147823382853662009-05-24T11:51:25.459+08:002009-05-24T11:51:25.459+08:00> 呢d事千祈唔好講民主。
同意。一人一句句句都有 point,到頭來加埋一齊乜都攪唔好。> 呢d事千祈唔好講民主。<br />同意。一人一句句句都有 point,到頭來加埋一齊乜都攪唔好。市場維京人https://www.blogger.com/profile/13331783950542619305noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33546923.post-4829102616686616542009-05-21T21:21:41.367+08:002009-05-21T21:21:41.367+08:00HK大部份整poster同powerpoint一樣,
都係想張所有既point/message塞晒入...HK大部份整poster同powerpoint一樣,<br />都係想張所有既point/message塞晒入去... 何苦呢anfhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01182876303009924527noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33546923.post-54411796114509813692009-05-21T11:25:06.075+08:002009-05-21T11:25:06.075+08:00>塞米
綠色當然會好d,但係對比唔夠大。果d人就會呀支呀佐,宜家我個解釋係:黃黑係世界公認對...>塞米<br /><br />綠色當然會好d,但係對比唔夠大。果d人就會呀支呀佐,宜家我個解釋係:黃黑係世界公認對比最大的顏色,工程、建築都用呢兩隻色引人注意同埋識別,咁解佢地就會明。<br /><br />下面d字點樣襯,留返俾佢地個designer 玩小明咯。<br /><br />至於logo放頂係中大的要求,無計啦。<br /><br />努力!黑人https://www.blogger.com/profile/11183654603140382242noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33546923.post-54729023477222167002009-05-21T05:44:50.440+08:002009-05-21T05:44:50.440+08:001 : 顏色問題反而唔係太大(我係指樹影咋...其他就...哈哈哈),"聖言同行者"不妨用白色試下?...1 : 顏色問題反而唔係太大(我係指樹影咋...其他就...哈哈哈),"聖言同行者"不妨用白色試下?...同埋我覺得不如after下半既黃色都轉埋用淺綠色啦。<br /><br />2 : 課程內容比例無問題,不過我覺得可以擺得緊密D,同埋用D color 襯底將title同地方時間分別開來,咁樣就算個size同weight差唔多(eg : after入面date同venue個point size真係差唔多)既information都可以明顯有分別。<br /><br />3 : logo都係擺最底好D....<br /><br />4 : 信唔信佢地第一個反應,可能係覺得個title既字無dynamic效果覺得太生硬丫拿? <br /><br />5 : 我仲係唔明做乜人影要擺左邊...既然係主角做乜擺左左邊....?<br /><br /><br />廢話講完...繼續失業........囧塞米一條揚陸轟炸機https://www.blogger.com/profile/10159088202982169884noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33546923.post-37668793948882398452009-05-20T22:26:52.604+08:002009-05-20T22:26:52.604+08:00真系好好多哦.真系好好多哦.Bettyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05500212205851010599noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33546923.post-14429905764177886272009-05-20T18:44:33.305+08:002009-05-20T18:44:33.305+08:00>xiao zhu
顏色霉,係因為好多墨緣色的色地,個天又係肉肉地色,再加上棵樹好多白洞,感...>xiao zhu<br /><br />顏色霉,係因為好多墨緣色的色地,個天又係肉肉地色,再加上棵樹好多白洞,感覺上就不太鮮明了<br /><br />講題方面我老爸都有提過,可惜不在控制範圍內,除左講者之外無人知佢地會講甚麼。<br /><br />假如講題係一個問題會較好:<br />「20年前的強國廣場,是風波、悲劇還是暴亂?」(曹澧麻教授)<br /><br />我都覺宜家唔知for 乜野人,我今晚同佢地提返下先,謝謝 ~黑人https://www.blogger.com/profile/11183654603140382242noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33546923.post-52603099034282905322009-05-20T17:43:21.593+08:002009-05-20T17:43:21.593+08:00舊海報:
1.人形真係怪,我就唔接受嘞。
2.喺 mon 就唔覺樹嘅顏色有咩大問題。個設計感覺似...舊海報:<br />1.人形真係怪,我就唔接受嘞。<br /><br />2.喺 mon 就唔覺樹嘅顏色有咩大問題。個設計感覺似版畫 feel,版畫效果唔係咁適合呢個主題。<br /><br />3.文字內容多真係好慘,慘在諗嘅人往往因為貪心,乜都想擺晒落去。不過我覺得呢次有一個敗筆係唔關設計事嘅,而係講題嘅問題。講題一果兩個講題太長喇,咩都想講,冇諗清楚如果簡短有力啲,會更加容易吸引人,最重要嘅係,容易畀人記得。呢兩個題目,睇幾次都係噏唔番出黎;人哋問你聽咩講座呀,哦,呢,果個咩一本書上一咩一咩呢!咁就死得啦!<br /><br />改左之後的確鮮明好多。如果畀我揀,我會加番一個簡單嘅副題 "聖經牧民進階訓練"。因為講真,唔知道張海報嘅目標係咩人,畀我睇,就算舊果張好似多啲資料,但係都唔係好具體知道其實係乜。xiao zhuhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03287426495158084726noreply@blogger.com